Works Cited
"16 Important Pros and Cons of Cloning humans." Green Garage. N.p., 15 Oct. 2015. Web. 10 Nov. 2016.
In this non-fiction text, which is a blog post from the Green Garage, The article attempts to state the positives and negatives for human cloning which is outlawed by the united nations. The article contains pros and cons that are more related to the environment and every day things that effect humanity such a infertility and how human cloning would effect nature as a whole. This source seems to be favoring the banning of human cloning because of the more extensive interest in this side of the article. The bias argument against the pros section of the article is very clear unlike the article "Human Cloning Ethics: The Pros and Cons", where the author shows much less bias towards either side. It would be beneficial to the researcher to read both articles because they show two different sides to human cloning.
Brite, Cheryl. "10 Reasons Why Cloning Is Bad For Humanity." LifeStylePassion. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Nov. 2016.
This article contains information discussing the consciences that human cloning will have on the economy and the entire world in general. The author of this article is an experienced writer that has dived into many different areas of science with her past works. Their viewpoint on human cloning in this article is that it is extremely unethical and could cause tons of different social problems. This article contains similar information as "Library: Why Human Cloning Is Immoral." because they both talk about religious values and views on human cloning. The researcher benefits greatly from reading both sources because the information is presented with two different styles and allows the reader to grasp information that may have otherwise been missed.
Chang, Pao. "Human Cloning Ethics: The Pros and Cons." EnergyFanaticscom. N.p., 26 Jan. 2016. Web. 10 Nov. 2016.
In this non-fiction text, Pao Chang closely compares the positives and negatives to human cloning very well. The best thing about the article is it freedom of almost all bias. The author also explores interesting ideas for the possibilities of human cloning such as medical testing on clones because "technically speaking", some people would believe that the clones are not real humans. On the other side of this Chang believes this would create a whole new racial discrimination where clones were treated poorly. This is closely related to both the article by Green Garbage and the article "Pros and Cons of Reproductive Cloning" because it adds more to an already sufficient list of both pros and cons.
"Cloning Fact Sheet." National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI). N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Nov. 2016.
This article contains information discussing the hard facts about human cloning. It talks about how humans can be cloned specifically and answers other questions such as, “Do clones ever occur naturally?”. The author of this article is a member of the National Human Genome Research Institute. Their viewpoint on human cloning is that it can be used for medical purposes and will be very beneficial to the human race. This article contains similar information as “Pros and Cons of Reproductive Cloning” because they both agree that human cloning can be used for advancements in the medical field but it also has its downsides. The researcher benefits greatly from reading both sources because the information is presented with two different styles and allows the reader to grasp information that may have otherwise been missed.
Double Negative | Short Film. Youtube. N.p., n.d. Web.
Dovey, Dana. "Human Cloning: Just Because We Haven't Doesn't Mean We Can't." Medical Daily. N.p., 26 June 2015. Web. 10 Nov. 2016.
This article contains information discussing the possibility of human cloning. It talks about how human cloning is not legal therefor no one has been recorded to actually have done it but scientists have been able to grow human embryos. However, they are forced to stop the development of the embryo. The author of this article is a journalist that has her master’s degree and multiple years of experience. Their viewpoint on human cloning in this article is that it is very unethical. This article contains similar information as "How to Clone: Human Cloning - Is Cloning Ethical?" because they both discuss the ethics behind human cloning. The researcher benefits greatly from reading both sources because the information is presented with two different styles and allows the reader to grasp information that may have otherwise been missed.
"How to Clone: Human Cloning - Is Cloning Ethical?" How to Clone: Human Cloning – Is Cloning Ethical? N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Nov. 2016.
This article contains information discussing the ethics behind human cloning. It goes in depth into how the child would feel emotionally and physically. The author of this article is a futurist keynote speaker. Their viewpoint on human cloning in this article is that human cloning is not ethical and may pose many physical and emotion risks. This article contains similar information as, “10 Reasons Why Cloning Is Bad For Humanity” because they both look into the negatives of human cloning. The researcher benefits greatly from reading both sources because the information is presented with two different styles and allows the reader to grasp information that may have otherwise been missed.
"Pros and Cons of Reproductive Cloning." Human Cloning. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Nov. 2016.
In the non-fiction article, the writer talks about cloning as a asexual reproduction asset that humanity could learn to either love or hate. The article dives into the reproductive area of cloning specifically and states positive points such as same sex couples being able to create a baby that shares similarities from both recipients as well as stating negatives such as the whopping 95 percent fail rate in reproductive cloning in most other animals. The article is closely related to the article by Green Garage because however it does state positives and negatives the other seems to be more bias to the negative side of the spectrum.
Saunders, William. "Library: Why Human Cloning Is Immoral." Catholic News, Commentary, Information, Resources, and the Liturgical Year. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Nov.1016.
This article contains information discussing the ethics of human cloning from the churches perspective. It dives into information and direct quotes from the bible. The author of this article is a priest that has a fond interest in writing. Their viewpoint on human cloning in this article is that it is against the word of the Lord and the bible. This article contains similar information as "10 Reasons Why Cloning Is Bad For Humanity." because they both take a religious view on the stance for human cloning. The researcher benefits greatly from reading both sources because the information is presented with two different styles and allows the reader to grasp information that may have otherwise been missed.
Simon, Smith. "All The Reasons To Clone Human Beings." All The Reasons To Clone Human Beings. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Nov. 2016.
In this non-fiction text, which is an article written by Smith Simon, is an article about all the positive effects that human cloning would have on our society. The author talks about how human cloning can be used to cure people in ways that we can not without it. He also proceeds to discuss religions that have human cloning listed in their tenets. The author is a researcher that has been writing about human cloning since 1998. He supports it in every way possible and believes that there is no counter argument that is suitable for him to even discuss. This article is closely related to the article about the pros and cons of cloning written by Green Garage because they both have similar viewpoints on cloning and how it could greatly help the world around us.
Stephens, Patrick. "Human Cloning Is Good for All of Us." The Atlas Society. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Nov, 2016.
This article contains information discussing the uses for human cloning. It explains medical uses and how safe and effective cloning methods can be used. The author of this article is a journalist for The Atlas Society. Their viewpoint on human cloning in this article is that it is very good for medical uses and can save millions of lives and it can be practiced safely without much risk. This article contains similar information as "Human Cloning: Just Because We Haven't Doesn't Mean We Can't." because both articles look at the positive medical advantages of human cloning. The researcher benefits greatly from reading both sources because the information is presented with two different styles and allows the reader to grasp information that may have otherwise been missed.